{ FeedBlack }

Google Responds To KwikChex On Fake Reviews

admin — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:34:53 +0000

Following the broadcast of the BBC TV Click report on fake reviews, which featured KwikChex.com, KwikChex can report that Google have made a very positive response.

Faster reporting by KwikChex has now been made possible and dialogue has been opened up with a view to making longer term improvements regarding spam, rogue reviews and the quality of reviews on Google Maps.

KwikChex has responded initially by providing information to Google, including the methods they use for authentication and the process and benefits of authenticate accreditation – all aimed at the effective promotion and protection of reputable businesses and the improvement of consumer reassurance and protection.

BBC TV Reports On KwikChex Fake Review Campaign

admin — Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:10:02 +0000

A special report on BBC TV highlights the problems facing businesses and consumers because of inadequate checks by website review publishers.

A campaign started by the online reassurance and reputation resource, KwikChex.com, has been the subject of a BBC TV report. The BBC’s flagship technology programme, ‘Click’ produced a special report which highlighted how reputable and blameless businesses are being attacked and defamed online on resources such as Google Maps Reviews.

The programme featured one particular case that had been flagged to the BBC by KwikChex – the story of a particularly nasty attack on UK business, Cream Photography – which spiralled into an assault on over 150 photographic and wedding supply companies across the UK. It highlighted how the maligned businesses were struggling to have what was an obvious and vicious spam attack removed from the Google resource.

A KwikChex spokesperson said: “Having the BBC on board will help publicise this serious problem – and we are pleased to have been able to contribute so significantly to the content of the programme. We have been able to help many businesses to restore and enhance their online reputation, including some of those in the Cream Photography case, but the problem is huge and the participation of the media is vital – in fact, even though the BBC have been in contact with Google and they have responded by saying they ‘have software in place to automatically detect spam reviews’, we are just about to submit reports to them about the Cream Photography case, because we have found a dozen businesses that are still suffering from these particular reviews – months after the initial alarm was raised to Google.”

He added: our job is actually to enhance and promote trusted, reputable businesses on the worldwide web – but we are certainly not going to drop the ball on this subject until online review publishers improve their resources to better protect decent businesses and to provide a higher degree of truthfulness to consumers.”

An article about the BBC report is on the Click website

and the full programme can be watched on the internet in the UK on the BBC iPlayer - click here

Or use a Google video search – bbc click fake google reviews

KwikChex launches ‘Google Maps Reviews – Improve Or Remove’ Campaign

admin — Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:59:44 +0000

KwikChex has launched a campaign to help tackle the problems created by rogue posters using Google Map Reviews. Many reputable businesses are being attacked online by fake, malicious and unfair reviews – and then they experience severe difficulties in getting them removed or even responding effectively to them, which is resulting in financial losses in many cases. The map reviews are also being used by dishonest businesses and scammers posting fake good reviews to dupe consumers.

It is just too easy to abuse the Google Review system and too difficult for most businesses to resolve and although KwikChex has been very successful in removing fake reviews for members and Google have sped up their responses to KwikChex fake review reports, the real solution required is for Google to make improvements that help authenticate reviews. If they can’t get more honesty into the system then the only way that reputable businesses and consumers can be better protected is for Google to withdraw their own review resource completely.

A KwikChex spokesperson said “Whilst we have been able to help businesses with this problem, it is not fair that they are having to pay to address flaws that Google are responsible for. We would rather be focusing on our core services, which are authenticating and promoting reputable businesses.”

The campaign has been set up on Google Groups and is called Google Maps Review – Improve Or Remove. Businesses wishing to join can visit KwikChex.com, click on ‘Fake Reviews’ and link to the campaign.

Or click here to go directly to the campaign group

1 million results for ‘incompetent vets’

admin — Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:20:39 +0000

Vets are starting to realise that online reviews are now hugely significant in search engine results. Just entering the phrase ‘incompetent vets’ into Google returns over 1 million results – and some of the information we have discovered in online searches is extremely aggressive and very high profile in search engines.- there are almost no moderation controls imposed, and they pull in results from many other sites and attach themselves to the location & profile of the review target. In addition there are a growing number of ’specialist’ review sites that focus entirely on the veterinary profession. Some sites are set up with the specific intent to destroy the reputation of a veterinary practice.

Examples of ‘ this vet killed my dog’ type postings are everywhere on the web, as are many other serious allegations. KwikChex found many effective campaigns against individual vets and practices – that is people using multiple review sites and Google maps solely in order to damage the practice. When this is done effectively, the vet’s online profile is seen as extremely untrustworthy.

True or False?

That’s the problem – whilst there are many with legitimate complaints, particularly of negligence, who may well have been frustrated by not being able to use the official ‘regulator’, the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS), or the courts to take action, there are also a very large number of fake and malicious reviews against reputable practitioners – and the public simply can’t tell the difference. What’s more, even a good vet is bound to have someone complain about them at some time, but even if they have an almost perfect satisfaction rate, a single aggrieved person can undo that in the space of about an hour on the worldwide web.

Reputation Enhancement, Protection & Promotion

KwikChex provides the solutions that enable reputable businesses to turn significant reputation threats into exceptional, reputation-based promotion.

KwikChex accreditation is an immediate promotion and defence tool. Members have the resources to monitor, manage and promote their reputation. They are able to use KwikChex independently authenticated reviews and testimonials on their websites and on review sites. They can remove and invalidate fake and malicious reviews – and reduce the risk of complaints at source, using the KwikChex Reputation Manual.

The public are better protected too – with access to reviews and information that they can trust and a robust and effective complaints and concerns process.

Google Removes Fake Review In Response To Latest Report From KwikChex

admin — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:33:12 +0000

One of the worst examples yet of a fake and malicious review on Google Maps has been rapidly removed after KwikChex verified the facts.

Storm Photography of Colchester in the UK had a malicious review posted on Google maps a month ago (16th Feb) and had not managed to have it deleted.

At first glance the review appeared to have come from another photography business in Crewe, Cheshire.

In fact, this company, Cream Wedding Photography was an even bigger victim of malicious Google Review posting.

KwikChex had verified that both businesses are reputable. A third party mounted a campaign which makes it appear that Cream were posting insults and spam on photographers websites across the UK. Cream have published the facts on their website www.creamphoto.co.uk in a bid to protect their own reputation.

KwikChex sent an independent verification report to Google and the offending review in this case was removed 10 minutes later.

We would like to thank Google on this occasion for their rapid response and urge them to continue responding to our authenticated notifications in this way.

Update on Google Map Review issues

Google state that they take these issues seriously and we are seeing evidence that this is the case. KwikChex will continue to provide independently authenticated reports to Google – and to offer to provide solutions.

We are also aware that they appear to have some more complex problems when it comes to removing reviews pulled in to Google Maps from third party sites. it seems that even when successfully removed from the original site, Google’s search system has difficulties in purging the result, and the offending reviews are therefore staying live on Google. This explanation is not much comfort to reputable businesses that are having their businesses damaged, but we understand that Google are aware of it and working on the problem.

We would urge people to continue to notify us us of fake and malicious reviews.

Join our facebook campaign ‘Web of Lies’ to rid the web of fake and malicious online reviews – Click here

California Permanent Make Up Artist Cathy Waechter

admin — Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:56:16 +0000

Cathy Waechter’s business, Absolutely Beautiful Permanent Makeup (www.abpmubycathy.com) is based in Riverside, California.

She was attacked in an online review in January in a local Yahoo review. The reviewer claimed that she was suing her for physical injury and urged people not to give her business.

Cathy was successful in having the review removed from Yahoo – but as is often the case it still appeared prominently on Google Map reviews – much more damaging because they become attached to the business/website and are very prominent in search results.

We evaluated this review and found that the reviewer had failed to provide any evidence whatsoever. We therefore immediately posted the following response on Cathy’s Google Map Reviews:

If immediate remedial action is not taken by Google further pressure will be brought to bear on Google to resolve this (further updates will be posted on Feedblack.com and KwikChex.com). Cathy Waechter has a reputable business that has been threatened by unverified reviews that malign her reputation. KwikChex is pleased to be able to assist Cathy – and all other reputable businesses that have had similar problems.

Get the solutions on KwikChex.com

See the news on Feedblack.com

Join our facebook campaign ‘Web of Lies’ to rid the web of fake and malicious online reviews – Click here

Reputable Property Company Attacked Online By Convicted Fraudster

admin — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:57:09 +0000

Parkcrest Construction is a well established property developer in the New Forest Area. They have always had an excellent reputation.

They discovered that a website titled ‘Parkcrest Construction Information’ had been created with the sole intention of besmirching the reputation of Parkcrest and the owner, Richard Kingham.

Investigations revealed that the so called ‘victim’ described on the website is one Paul Robertson – a former GP who was struck off by the General Medical Council and jailed for swindling a disabled pensioner out of his life savings in the New Forest. You can see the BBC report by clicking here

The full story can be found on Richard Kingham’s personal website.

And on his personal blog

Thankfully, it doesn’t take much analysis to figure out who the villain is here, but nevertheless, in this world of instant online information, this type of feedblack can be damaging. Parkcrest are now joining KwikChex, which establishes them as a trusted and reputable company. In addition, they are using the KwikChex bespoke services to respond, including the creation of blogs to reinforce the truth of the matter, reviews that highlight that they have been verified as a KwikChex member, reviews posted against the perpetrators, including Google sidewiki on their site and Web of Trust (mywot.com), social networking releases and Feedblack news.

Join our facebook campaign ‘Web of Lies’ to rid the web of fake and malicious online reviews – Click here

Web of Lies?

admin — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:32:55 +0000

An evaluation of the scale and consequences of the growth of unverifiable, false and malicious online reviews.

You run a reputable business. Your customers say nice things about you. Then one day you find that someone is saying something that is very far from nice – and that anyone trying to find out about you and your business is likely to read it and believe it.

KwikChex.com, an online reputation verification business has been carrying out extensive research on the problem.

The conclusion is that it is widespread, growing, and extremely damaging – and it is being exacerbated by the products of some very large brands, including Google and McAfee.

Here are just a few examples of what is on the web at the moment:

About a Hairdressing Salon in Florida, USA:

‘The salon IS owned by husband and wife and althought (sic) prices cannot be beat the owner conducts himself in an inappropriate manner! He mixes his own solution in the back using mostly formaldehyde and constantly offers free massages to UNDERAGE girls! He is so sleezy!!!(sic)’

About a High School in New York

‘My brother is a 10th grader involved with heroin injecting and crack/ marijuana because of the crazy stress..SEND your kids here if you wanna RUIN THEM.’

About a DJ business in Melbourne Australia

‘The worst of the worst! The DJ you provided hands down ruined my wedding. Very unprofessional company. Full of lies and have no idea what they are doing. I have never seen a company write reviews for themselves! My husband fell for it and we paid for it on my most special day!’

About a Michelin starred, celebrity chef-owned London Restaurant

‘Shockingly poor - horrendous service followed by mediocre food. We left after the starter as it took 40 minutes and still no main course had arrived. Not only that but we had asked 5 staff when it would be coming and no one came back to apologise. This was after spending over £150 on wine alone. Pathetic! Go to the River Cafe for a better Italian experience‎.’

These all appear on Google Reviews. (On Google Maps). Such reviews can be posted anonymously by anyone – and even though there is no verification process and the owners absolutely refute them, requests to Google to have them removed have been ignored or denied.

And it’s not only Google that enables such online malice in the apparent pursuit of ‘consumer awareness’ – nor is it confined to small businesses and high schools.

The following appears as a review on the McAfee SiteAdvisor review for the official site of the UK Labour Party – the elected government party:

‘This web site spams using third (party) various online marketing companies. It also has a list of convicted child perverts within its ranks who like passing photographs of kids to party members. Best to avoid this web site, as their messages are 80% lies.’

Or, again from McAfee Site Advisor, this review for Microsoft’s website:

‘if you access this domain you risk to unwillingly download and install malicious software (virus, Trojans, spyware, etc) that may damage your computer’.

The Google and McAfee review systems get a dose of their own medicine too – with reviewers using their own systems to both maliciously attack the companies and to complain about these very issues.

Here are a few examples:

Google Map Reviews on Google (HQ)

‘HOW CAN ANYONE LIKE GOOGLE STAY IN BUSINESS I SPOKE TO ONE OF THERE (sic) REPS YESTERDAY HE WAS RUDE TO ME SWORE AT ME THEN TALKED ABOUT HOW HE AND SOME OF HIS CO WORKERS ENJYOED (sic) BEING PEDO…. (sic) WELL I CANT EVEN FINISH THE STATEMENT I AM SO DISGUSTED I JUST HOPE THERES NOT A DAY CARE THERE’‎

‘Why does Google Maps allow postings in this area? What has it got to do with searching for a location? They do not check for slander FIRST. They just allow people to post what they want. We have a wrong posting on our map location and we have asked google now over and over to remove this FALSE statement made by this person. We spend a lot of money with Google Adwords for both businesses that we run, and to see this terrible service from Google is a JOKE! They don’t reply back to your flagging, they don’t remove it when it is SLANDER. Lets post about Google – they charge you a lot of money in their Google Adwords and you don’t even come up to the top hits when you pay for this service. They charge too much for their terrible service.‎’

Reviews on McAfee SiteAdvisor – about McAfee SiteAdvisor

‘THEY DON’T PROTECT YOU FROM SITE THAT ARE NOTHING BUT FRAUDULENT SITES. ‘

‘People here seem to be creating multiple accounts just to spam other sites with fake reviews and people might probably believe them?’

‘Good Reviews’

There is also overwhelming evidence of fraudulent good reviews. The majority are posted to fool consumers into doing business with scammers. Many, though are now being placed to counter false bad reviews that businesses are having difficulty removing – several businesses that have contacted KwikChex have admitted to this tactic – and below is another post on the Google HQ reviews that claims that Google employees encourage this practice.

‘I wrote letters to Google and made several phone calls about a problem with their map review service. I never received a reply back Google eventually emailed me about the issue but declined to help saying they could do nothing and I should get my buddies to write bogus positive reviews to counter act a bad review left by a nut job out to cause harm to my business.

The research also revealed the following comment on a ‘This site is good’ McAfee SiteAdvisor review regarding the Ku Klux Clan official website:

‘If you breed with blacks or Mexicans you’re actually breeding backwards. But that’s just science.’

In fact, posting fake good reviews can lead to prosecution, as was demonstrated last year when the New York attorney general’s office prosecuted Lifestyle Lift, a cosmetic surgery company when evidence emerged that they had instructed employees to file good reviews. They settled the case with a payment of $300,000. And Andrew M. Cuomo, New York’s attorney general, said in a statement that Lifestyle Lift’s

“attempt to generate business by duping consumers was cynical, manipulative and illegal.”

It is illegal in many counties, including throughout the European Union – but this is not stopping the growth, as it seems that awareness amongst consumers and businesses about the laws already in place is very limited. And as long as review sites allow anonymity and make little or no attempt to verify reviews, the process of law will continue to be obstructed and the problem will inevitably keep on growing.

The Scale and Significance of the Problem

The KwikChex research identified thousands of review and complaints sites – and still it was only the tip of the iceberg. (A Google search using ‘review sites for businesses’ stated that about 196 million results had been found and whilst the majority will be duplicates, it still highlights the scale of the issue).

Many, like Google Map Reviews, McAfee SiteAdvisor and Yelp are very big names, carrying millions of reviews. Some try harder than others to guard against abuse – but the overwhelming conclusion is that far from helping consumers, the spread of such sites and lack of verification of the truthfulness of the reviews causes more confusion and doubt – and is certainly capable of ruining the reputation of many very good businesses, many of whom will not even be aware that they are being attacked. In effect, it means that millions of good reviews could have been placed in a clear attempt to defraud consumers and millions of bad reviews could have been placed by competitors, disgruntled former employees or others with a personal agenda.

Solutions

Following the research, which was conducted to assist KwikChex in providing the best way to identify, verify, promote and defend the world’s best businesses and help protect consumers, KwikChex is launching a range of initiatives and services, including.

This website – centre of the Feedblack Campaign – Feedblack is the campaign name and term being used by KwikChex to identify and rectify the problem of false and malicious reviews and accusations and can be used by consumers and businesses to report all suspected cases.

The Authenticated Review System. It enables KwikChex to robustly verify the authenticity of customer reviews whilst protecting the privacy of reviewers. The system has already been developed for various sectors and countries and is currently being implemented. KwikChex is now contacting review sites to request cooperation. We are also seeking approval (via evaluation and monitoring) from government departments across the world that will provide increased reassurance for consumers.

KwikChex Monitor – a part of the KwikChex Gold membership that keeps track and sends alerts of any web content that mentions your business. Not just your main brand, but your executives, your sub-brands, and even your competition and suppliers.

All of the above are part of the KwikChex.com verification and protection service.

Join our facebook campaign ‘Web of Lies’ to rid the web of fake and malicious online reviews – Click here

For more information and enquiries, please contact info@kwikchex.com

{ FeedBlack } on Urban Dictionary

admin — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 09:07:03 +0000

Bad Feedback : Unverified, unproven and usually anonymous online feedback and comments that:

1) Are posted to intentionally damage the reputation of businesses or individuals.

2) Are expressed opinions with little or no factual credibility.

3) Are praise and testimonials posted by people with a vested interest (i.e website owners, including fraudsters) that seek to deceive website users for gain.

Any unverified, unproven comment made online, such as:

Negative feedblack – This company sucks’

Get The T-Shirt

{ FeedBlack }

admin — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 08:22:18 +0000

{ FeedBlack }

{ is the new term for unverified and often anonymous online feedback }
Numerous sites have appeared whose stated intentions are to provide opinions from the public that are meant to guide the public on which businesses to deal with and what websites to visit.

The public are often advised to type in to a search engine the word ‘complaints’ after a website or business name, but in reality the results can be totally misleading, with the potential purpose to maliciously deceive. The comments can be posted by competitors, disgruntled employees – anyone – and they still get published, often without the knowledge of the business being accused. Even good reviews can be bad for the public as they can be placed by website owners themselves.

The potential damage and the confusion being caused may become greater if a tool quietly launched by Google last September catches on. Called Google Sidewiki, it enables anyone who has downloaded the Google toolbar to post comments on any website which are then visible to all with the toolbar facility when they visit any site that has a Sidewiki posting. The full implications of this could be immense and will be the subject of a special KwikChex report to be published shortly.

Feedblack is a danger to consumers as its unproven nature can and will mislead. It is also a danger to perfectly respectable businesses.

KwikChex is helping to resolve these issues by providing a fully verified reputation and consumer reassurance service. Members are comitted to ‘Best On The Web’ practices.

In order to undo the damage caused by Feedblack, members can post on unverified review sites and tools, such as Google Sidewiki, the following statement:

‘This business is a member of KwikChex, the leading reputation and public reassurance service. KwikChex members commit to ‘Best On The Web’ practices which are independently verified and their profile is available on KwikChex.com’

KwikChex supports online information, feedback and comments that are verifiable and campaigns against unsubstantiated postings by anonymous individuals that have malicious intent or that are intended to mislead the public.‘